When faced with rockwool insulation vs fiberglass, which one do you consider as the best? You do not need to be confused since you know some differences between them since this article will wrap it up briefly.
The Difference Between Fiberglass and Mineral Wool Insulation
Below are some matters of comparison between fiberglass and mineral wool insulation. To make your decision about the differences between the two easier, read this!
- Thermal Utilization
People use insulation primarily for acoustic and thermal purposes. Mineral wool performs somewhat better compared to fiberglass in all of these areas. Certain mineral wool batts, for instance, have an R-15 of over 3.5 inches, but the fiberglass ones have an R-13 of around the same depth.
- Insulation Weight
Importantly, while mineral wool has a greater R-value than fiberglass insulation, it is denser and heavier. In situations where a high R-value is required, including an R-49, the mass of mineral wool is much larger than fiberglass.
As a consequence, in situations such as attics in which the insulation would be immediately on the cement, the density of mineral wool may be unreasonably heavy, making fiberglass a preferable alternative.
- Sound Management
Regarding the acoustics of rockwool insulation vs fiberglass, mineral wool provides somewhat excellent audio control capabilities. Nevertheless, the variance in acoustic performance is so small that even humans will be unable to spot the differences inside a wall cavity.
Both fiberglass and mineral can employ various configurations to satisfy certain Sound Transmission Class (STC) standards.
- Fire Prevention
Many individuals choose insulating materials focused on fire safety as a complement to acoustic and thermal performance. Although both unfaced fiberglass and unfaced mineral wool are resistant to fire and slow the spread of fire, mineral wool has a far higher thermal conductivity than fiberglass. It is hence commonly regarded as the better fire-resistant material.
- Moisture Control and Insulation Facings
Both materials usually require a facing to minimize vapor drive in terms of water vapor driven by rockwool insulation vs fiberglass. But, mineral wool can not include a face. As a consequence, if preventing vapor drive and humidity is essential, a faced fiberglass solution can be preferable compared to an unfaced mineral wool option featuring a separate vapor barrier.
- Insulation Handleability
Furthermore, installers should think about how they like to handle the materials. The low-strength fiberglass is substantially more malleable. In critical applications, sturdy and bonded glass fibers will not sag throughout the wall hollow, settle, or even break down, regardless of their flexibility.
In contrast to fiberglass’s elasticity, Mineral wool is significantly stiffer due to its thickness. Several installers favor mineral wool’s stiffness over fiberglass’s flexibility. Treatment preferences differ across installers, so it is mostly a matter of personal taste in this area.
- Ideal Application
Although fiberglass and mineral wool are useful in similar applications, one is more popular than the other. Regardless of the disadvantages of mineral wool insulation, it is often useful to insulate external walls, basements, or warmed crawl areas.
It is also suitable for continuous insulation purposes. Fiberglass is commonly used to wrap exterior and interior walls, garages, basements, and attics, but not for constant outside insulation.
Mineral wool and fiberglass are both suitable house insulation materials.
Cost of Rockwool Insulation VS Fiberglass
Compared to mineral wool insulation, fiberglass is 25 to 50 percent less expensive. Fiberglass costs about 57 to 72 cents for every square foot. Mineral wool insulation costs roughly $1 to $1.10 for every square foot.
So, those are some briefs about rockwool insulation vs fiberglass. Make sure you know what your needs are to select the best one that matches them.